SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1358

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VIKRAM NATH AND PRATYUSH KUMAR, JJ.
MUNNA RAJBHAR ....Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ….Opposite Party
(Capital Case No. 2090 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal Nos. 2120 and 3400 of 2015, decided on 25th August, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
From Jail, P.K. Chaurasia and R.K. Singh for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 147, 148, 302/149, 201 – Arms Act, 1959 – Section 4/25 – Murder – Conviction – Neithere motive was fully proved – Only witness of motive PW-1 is an interested witness and suggestion given by defence that in order to oust claim of his – Deceased wife) she had been falsely implicated so that entire share of deceased would come to informant and his father who was still alive – Surprisingly father of informant i.e. brother of deceased had not come forward as a witness to prosecution case – Evidence of extra judicial confession is also not worth reliance – Evidence of last seen is inconsistent with medical evidence – Judgment of trial Judge set aside.

       Appeal Allowed.

Judgment :

(Delivered by Vikram Nath, J.)

The aforementioned criminal appeals have been preferred by the accused assailing the correctness of the judgment and orders dated 29.04.2015 and 6.5.2015 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Ballia, in Sessions Trial No.24 of 2007, State vs. Smt. Hoshila Devi and 4 others, arising out of Case Crime No.116 of 2006, under sections 147, 148, 302/149, 201 IPC, P.S. Rasra, District Ballia and Sessions Trial No.242 of 2007, State vs. Munna Rajbhar, arising out of Case Crime No.117 of 2006, under section 4/25 Arms Act, P.S. Rasra, District Ballia, whereby all the five accused have been convicted under sections 302/149, 201 IPC and accused appellant Munna Rajbhar has been convicted under section 4/25 Arms Act and further trial Judge awarded life sentence to accused-appellant Smt. Hoshila Devi, Ramjit Yadav, Awadhesh Yadav and Dinesh Yadav and also imposed fine of Rs.50,000/- to each and further awarded 3 years rigorous imprisonment to each of the four accused alongwith fine of Rs.3,000/- to each whereas accused appellant Munna Rajbhar has been awarded death sentence alongwith fine of Rs.1,00,000/- (one lakh) and further sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.10,000/-, under section 201 IPC and also one year's rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- under section 25 Arms Act.

One Shatrughan Yadav (PW-1) gave a written complaint at Police Station, Rasra, District Ballia, on 15.08.2006 at 11.00 a.m. stating that he was resident of Village Azizpur Khadasra, Police Station Rasra, District Ballia. His uncle Ramdhyan was married to Smt. Hoshila Yadav, daughter of Ramjit Yadav, resident of Siswar Kalan, Police Station Nagra, District Ballia. His Chachi (Aunt) Smt. Hoshila was frequently visited by one Munna Rajbhar, son of Mahesh Rajbhar of her village and she also used to keep in constant touch with him on telephone. His Chacha (Uncle) kept on objecting to her relations and association with Munna Rajbhar and this was a continuing issue of argument between them. A couple of days before Rakshabandhan, his Chachi (Aunt) was talking on the telephone with Munna Rajbhar when his Chacha (Uncle) scolded her. Annoyed she left for her parents house saying that she would not discontinue her association with Munna and would prefer leaving his Chacha. On 10.08.2006 which was Thursday, on the request of his Chachi, his Chacha left for his in-laws place that is Village Siswar Kala and since then he has not returned. On 14.08.2006 he learnt that his Chacha Ramdhyan had been done to death and his dead body was lying near Village Katahura since the night of 10/11-08-2006. His Chachi Hoshila Devi, her father Ramjit Yadav, her brothers Awadhesh Yadav and Dinesh Yadav and Munna Rajbhar are involved in the murder of his Chacha. He prayed that his complaint be registered and appropriate action be taken against the aforesaid persons. On the basis of the said written complaint (Ex. Ka-1) Chik FIR was prepared (Ex. Ka-6) by Constable 716 Mahendra Kumar registered as Case Crime No.116 of 2006, under sections 302/201/34 IPC.

It appears that a dead body of an unknown person was recovered by the police upon intimation given by one Uma Shankar Yadav and was sent for post-mortem which was conducted on 11.08.2006 at 4.30 p.m. by Dr. B. Narayan, Medical Officer, District Hospital, Ballia. The post-mortem-report Ex. Ka-3 recorded the following ante-mortem injuries on the body of the deceased:

1. Incised wound 8 cm x 4cm up to tracheal depth on front of left neck. Trachea cut through and through of level of 4th and 5th rings Rt. Carotid & Jugular vesicles cut through & through.

2. Incised wound 4 cm x 2 cm on Rt. Side of Abdomen 2 cm above at 10 O' clock position omentum & small intestine protruding out of wound.

After lodging of the FIR on 15.08.2006 the Investigating Officer arrested Munna Rajbhar on 16.08.2006 at about 8.30 a.m. On his pointing out he recovered a knife w











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top