2016 Supreme(All) 115
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : V.K. SHUKLA AND MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, JJ.
Smt. GEETA DIXIT AND OTHERS .....Petitioners
Versus
SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 45262 of 2015, decided on 29th January, 2016)
Counsel :
L.C. Srivastava and Neeraj Srivastava for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.
Headnote:U.P. Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government or Public Corporations in Government Service (Rescission) Rules, 2003—Rules 1, 2 and 3—Project employees—Service condition—Non-Formal Education Scheme—Petitioners sought to extend all consequential benefits alongwith 12% interest treating cadre holder post—Submission of petitioners that being cadre holder became fully entitled for benefit of promotion, time scale, super time scale, gratuity, pension etc.—Appointments of petitioners were not made against the substantive post—Right of retrenched employees to be considered for absorption accrued under 1991 Rules but who has not been absorbed till the commencement of 2003 Rules shall stand terminated from date of enforcement of 2003 Rules—Petitioners at no point of time proceeded to join in pursuance of order of State Government dated 23.3.2001 and admittedly they have not rendered any work since then—Once petitioners have not chosen to be absorbed under L.T. Grade Teachers, even though they were not retrenched employees—No directive can be issued in violation of Rules merely because some incumbents have been offered appointment, under cover of orders passed by this Court will not improve the case of the petitioners. [Paras 13 to 26]
Result; Petition Dismissed.
Hon’ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.—Smt. Geeta Dixit and 5 others are before this Court for quashing Para 5 (1) of the impugned order dated 15.6.2015 passed by the Secretary, Basic Education, Government of UP, Lucknow-respondent No. 1 and have further prayed for direction commanding the respondents to extend all consequential benefits alongwith 12% interest thereon treating cadre holder post as per terms of earlier judgment dated 5.4.2002.
2. Brief background of the case, as is reflected from the record, is that a Non-Formal Education Scheme was initially introduced by the Central Government in the year 1979-80 for imparting education to children in the age group of 6 to 14 years, who either did not attend any school or who after the joining left the school before completing primary education. Initially the expenses incurred towards the said scheme were shared by the State Government and Central Government in the ratio of 50 : 50 but later on, it was revised to 40% : 60%. The said scheme was implemented in the State of Uttar Pradesh under the Directorate of Education (Basic) U.P. For the smooth running of the scheme, certain posts, including the posts of Supervisors were created by the State Government vide Government Order dated 11.8.1981 to supervise the work at various centres. Consequently appointments were made to the post of Supervisors by the Government on 11.2.1982. The said scheme was purely temporary in nature. Appointments were made purely on temporary and ad hoc basis and were liable to be terminated at any time without notice. It appears that subsequently the said scheme was modified and was known as ‘Non-Formal Education Project’. Various posts were created by the Government on 30.3.1988. The said posts so created included the post of Project Officer at project level. It is also reflected that the project itself was temporary in nature. The Government Order clearly visualised that all the posts would be temporary liable to be abolished at any time without any prior information.
3. It is also reflected that the posts other than the posts of Project Officer (Pariyojana Adhikari) had their equivalent posts in the education department under the Director of Education, U.P. and accordingly all the posts other than posts of Pariyojana Adhikari were filled on deputation by transfer of officers/officials holding equivalent posts in the regular education. The State Government vide order dated 15.7.1988 had proceeded to appoint a Selection Committee empowered to select Project Officers. As per terms and conditions the persons appointed as Project Officers would be bound to work for at least three years and further that on cessation of the project, their services would automatically come to an end. The Non-formal Education Project as indicated above continued till 31.3.2001. Thereafter, the Central Government stopped funding and abrogated the project. Consequently, the State Government proceeded to come out with a revised project under the name of ‘Education Guarantee Scheme and Alternative and Innovative Education’ w.e.f. 1.4.2001. The petitioners did not hold any lien on any posts as they were initially appointed as supervisors under ‘Non-Formal Education Scheme’, the posts were abolished but they were selected and re-engaged on the post of Project Officers under the ‘Non-Formal Education Project’ itself. Most of the petitioners were issued appointment letters on 13.8.1989 and on 27.2.1991. A Writ Petition being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 42806 of 2000 came to be filed by Pradeshiya Pariyojana Adhikari Anopcharik Shiksha Sangh, U.P., through its General Secretary and others v. State of U. P. and others, inter alia for the following reliefs :
“(a) A writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondents to treat the posts of Project Officer, Non-Formal Education as cadre post in the subordinate education (Gazetted) service with all consequential benefits thereof to the petitioners and the member