SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1612

PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
VIRENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ROHIT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vinod Sinha and Mahesh Chand Sharma for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.—O.S. No. 410/2009, Virendra Singh v. Rohit and others, was filed by plaintiff for specific performance of contract. The plaint averment was that defendants had agreed to sell the 1/6th of their share of property in bhumidhari land detailed in plaint for Rs. 60,000/- and received Rs. 30,000/- as advance consideration and agreed to execute sale-deed till 28.1.2009. Two of the defendants were minor, therefore said agreement was executed on their behalf by their mother, defendant No. 5. Plaintiff has been ready and willing to perform his part of contract, who had been asking and reminding the defendant to execute sale-deed in his favour after receiving remaining consideration, and also also given legal notice for the same but defendants were not ready to execute sale-deed as agreed between parties, therefore, plaintiff had filed suit for specific performance of contract.

2. The defendants had not admitted the plaint case in their written statement and pleaded that in pretext of executing document for loan the plaintiff had fraudulently got signed documents by defendants without any consideration. Therefore, the document of registered agreemen


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top