Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 10.4.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 2, Bhadohi at Gyanpur, whereby, the application paper No. 66 Ga filed by the petitioner for impleading one Rupesh Kumar Pandey as a party respondent to the claim petition has been rejected.

3. The respondents 1 and 2 filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which was registered as Motor Accident Claim No. 74 of 2010. Therein, they claimed compensation on account of death of Prabhu Nath, who was the husband of the first respondent and father of the second respondent. In the claim petition, it is alleged that Prabhu Nath was hit by a motor cycle bearing registration No. UP66E-4760 belonging to the petitioner, on 10.5.2010, as a result whereof, he died.

4. The claim petition was contested by the petitioner by filing a written statement in which it is accepted that the petitioner owns a motor cycle bearing registration No. UP66E 4760. However, it is alleged that the motor cycle belonging to the petitioner had not met with any accident. It is f