SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 854

SUNITA AGARWAL
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
NARESH CHANDRA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anand Prakash Srivastava for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—This writ petition arises out of the judgment and order dated 11.8.2015 passed by the Judge Small Causes Court, Bulandshahar in S.C.C case No. 19 of 2011 (Naresh Chandra Sharma v. Vinod Kumar) and also the Revisional Court order dated 11.2.2016 passed in J.S.C.C Revision No. 16 of 2015 (Naresh Chandra Sharma v. Vinod Kumar.

2. The eviction suit was filed before the Judge Small Causes Court, Bulandshahar on the ground that the shop was let out for running general merchandise business but without permission of the landlord the defendants started business of battery manufacturing. Moreover, the plaintiff did not want to continue the tenancy hence a notice to quit was served upon the petitioner through counsel by registered post. The defendants neither paid rent nor vacated the shop in question and, therefore, the ejectment suit was filed with the relief to deliver possession to the plaintiff/landlord.

3. The suit was decreed by the Small Causes Court (JSCC) on the ground that the tenancy is not protected by the provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 as the shop in question is a new construction exempted from the operation of the Act in view of Se
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top