SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 964

RITU RAJ AWASTHI
MOHD. ILIYAS – Appellant
Versus
RAM DULARI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Mohiuddin Khan, Mohd. Aslam Khan, Mohd. Adil Khan, Ghaus Beg and Mohd. Arif Khan for the Appellants; Apoorva Tiwari and Sunil Pandey for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ritu Raj Awasthi, J.—Heard Mr. Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohiuddin Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants as well as Mr. Sunil Pandey and Mr. Apoorva Tewari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents i.e., respondent Nos. 1 to 8.

2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 9 to 13. During pendency of appeal, respondent Nos. 6, 8 and 13 have died. They have been substituted by their legal heirs.

3. The instant second appeal has been filed by the defendants-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 31.5.2008 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 154 of 2005 (Smt. Ram Dulari and others v. Mohd. Ayyub Khan and others) by learned Special Judge (E.C.) Act, Lucknow setting aside the judgment and decree dated 6.10.2005 passed in Regular Suit No. 86 of 1990 (Ram Dulari and others v. Mohd. Ayyub Khan and others) by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lucknow by means of which the Trial Court had dismissed the suit of the respondents-plaintiffs for Specific Pe
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top