SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 921

VIKRAM NATH, RAVINDRA NATH KAKKAR
MUNISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
From Jail for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Nath Kakkar, J.

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17.9.2010 passed by the Special Judge, SC & ST Act, Kannauj, in S.T.No. 292 of 2008 arising out of Case Crime No.108 of 2003, State vs. Munish, convicting the appellant under Sections 376 I.P.C. and 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short 1989 Act'), and sentencing him under Section 376 IPC for 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/-and in default of payment of fine 6 months rigorous imprisonment and under Section 3(2)(v) of 1989 Act life imprisonment. Both sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that one Chhote Lal who along with his wife used to work at a brick kiln of Bahadurpur village, reported to the police that on 24.5.2008 they were at his tent (dwelling place) at brick kiln. Due to scorching heat the informant along with his four year old daughter Rita was lying on a brick stack. At about 10 O' Clock in the night, appellant Munish who too was engaged for withdrawal of bricks from the kiln, appeared there and said that a ghost had overcome him and requested to lig



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top