SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1064

PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
MUHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Amit Kumar Srivastava for the Applicant; G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.


1. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved for quashing the proceeding of Complaint Case No. 596 of 2015, Akbar Ali Vs. Adil and others, police station Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh and the summoning order dated 27.6.2016 of cognizance passed in it by Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 21, Azamgarh for offences under sections 323 and 504 IPC against four accused including present applicant.

2. The complaint case no. 3029 of 2014 (New No. 596 of 2015) was filed by present opposite party no. 2 Akbar Ali against four persons. In alleged act proposed accused committed offence on 31.7.2014 at about 8:00 a.m. when accused persons have allegedly trespassed the house of complainant, hurled abuses, threatened and caused injuries by fist, kicks, clubs and sticks.

3. Complainant had examined himself under section 200 Cr.P.C. and two witnesses under section 202 Cr.P.C, on the basis of which the trial court had passed summoning order dated 27.6.2016 by which all the four accused named on complaint were summoned for offence under section323, 504 IPC. The proceedings of said complaint case alongwith said order of cognizance is under challenge in pre



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top