SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1608

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA
RAMPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vinod Kumar Singh for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.—It is admitted that the scheme of administration of the institution provides a term of five years and by virtue of Clause 8, as amended, if elections are not held within five years and one month, authorized controller shall be appointed and such authorized controller is to ensure that elections are conducted and a valid body is constituted to act as Committee of Management of the institution. It is admitted in the facts of the present case that no elections, within the term, was conducted by the outgoing Committee and consequently, an authorized controller has been appointed on 20th February, 2016. The order of the Joint Director records that Principal, DIET shall be the authorized controller who shall get the elections conducted under scheme of administration within a period of three months. It appears that elections have not been held by the authorized controller. The authorized controller instead has sent a communication to the District Inspector of Schools to appoint one of the three suggested persons to act as Election Officer. It appears that District Inspector of Schools has appointed fourth respondent as Election Officer, vide order




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top