SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 577

SUDHIR AGARWAL, VIRENDRA KUMAR II
PREM SWAROOP SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.S. Pawar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Pursuant to order of date passed on Recall/Restoration Application, the writ petition is restored to its original number.

2. As requested and agreed by learned counsels for parties, we proceed to hear and decide this case finally at this stage.

3. This writ petition is directed against judgment and order dated 30.3.2015 passed by State Public Services Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”) in Claim Petition No. 1141 of 2013 whereby Claim Petition has been rejected and order dated 22.4.2014 passed by State Government pursuant to an interim order dated 11.10.2013 passed by Tribunal in the aforesaid Claim Petition has been confirmed.

4. The dispute relates to the grant of selection grade to petitioner on the post of Superintending Engineer with effect from 1.8.2001. Petitioner, admittedly was appointed as Assistant Engineer on 18.12.1970, promoted as Executive Engineer in August’ 1988, promoted as Superintending Engineer by order dated 8.3.2001 and ultimately retired after attaining age of superannuation on 31.10.2005. His grievance is that by order

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top