Hon’ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.—Heard Sri Ramendra Asthana, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Anand Kumar Pandey and Sri B.J. Singh, learned counsels for respondent No. 5.

Facts:

2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that Sri Anand Pathak and Smt. Anuradha Pathak (respondent Nos. 3 and 4) have executed a sale-deed on 5.3.2012 in favour of Smt. Asha Pathak (respondent No. 5). According to respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5, in the said sale-deed, inadvertently Khasra Plot No. 1916 measuring 0.016 hectare was mentioned instead of Khasra Plot No. 477 measuring 0.012 hectare and Khasra Plot No. 480 measuring 0.004 hectare out of an area of 0.016 hectare of village Nagwa, Pargana, Tehsil and District Ballia. Thus, under the aforesaid sale-deed dated 5.3.2012 a total land of 0.016 hectare was sold. The boundaries were correctly shown in the sale-deed but Khasra Plot No. 1916 was inadvertently mentioned instead of Khasra Plot Nos. 477 and 480. Subsequently, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 executed another sale-deed dated 3.6.2013 in favour of the petitioner on 1/2.6.2013 with respect to several plots including Khasra P