By the Court.—Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and perused the record. Perhaps one of the most crucial issues that comes up after getting a divorce is the matter of child custody, so is in the instant case where the appellant has approached this Court assailing the judgment and order dated 20.8.2015 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambedkar Nagar in Case No. 4 of 2014 (Akbal Ahmad v. Jamila Khatoon and another), under Section 7/25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, when the claim of the appellant for custody of his minor children has been refused.

The appellant has challenged the aforesaid judgment and order dated 20.8.2015 inter alia on the ground that the findings recorded by the Family Court are perverse and contrary to the materials available on record. The contention of the appellant is that not only the mother but also the other members of his in-laws are not well-educated and they have also no knowledge about the modern and technical education. In these circumstances, they would not be able to provide better education to his minor children, namely, Sahista Sana (aged about 7 years) and Wahisatunnisha (aged about 3 years). It has also bee