SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 1792

AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
SACHIN @ SACHINDER @ SATYENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ramanuj Yadav for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT :

1. The revisionist, Sachin @ Sachinder @ Satyendra has preferred this revision against the impugned judgment and order dated 4.1.2013 passed by Ist Additional District Judge (Ex-Cadre), Kushi Nagar, Padrauna, in S.T. No. 208/2012 (State Vs. Aslam and others) under Sections 363, 366, 376, 120B IPC, P.S. Kotwali Hata, District Kushi Nagar whereby the discharge application of revisionist has been rejected.

2. Brief facts giving rise to the present revision is that an FIR has been lodged by the informant, Sri Janardan Yadav on 31.12.2011 as Case Crime No. 1099 of 2011 under Sections 363, 366 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, Hata, District Kushi Nagar alleging therein that on 26.12.2011 his daughter namely Sindhu aged about 16 years was gone to the school of village and when she was not returned from the school till evening, it is brought to the notice that she has been misguided by accused on account of which she fled away with the co-accused Ram Niwas. Thereafter co-accused Ram Niwas and the alleged victim Sindhu have filed Writ Petition No. 7531 of 2012 (Ram Niwas Vs. State of U.P.) in which the victim, Sindhu claims to have voluntarily married with Ram Niwas out of her own sweet will and


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top