RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
PANJAB NATIONAL BANK, ALLAHABAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.
1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Shukla, for the appellant Tara Devi, Mrs. Swati Agarwal, for the appellant Punjab National Bank and A.G.A. for State of U.P.
2. These appeals have been filed from the judgment and order passed by Additional Session's Judge, Court No. 7/Special Judge [U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986], Varanasi dated 17.05.2013, in Criminal Reference No. 26 of 2010, State of U.P. vs. Tara Devi and Others (arising out of order of District Magistrate dated 30.06.2010 in Case No. 21 of 2010, under Section 14 of U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Cant, district Varanasi), attaching the properties of Tara Devi and her family members under the Act.
3. On the complaint of Ramayan Singh SHO Cholapur, Lal Bahadur Singh Constable clerk, registered FIR of Case Crime No. 360 of 1999, Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, against Jawahar Jaisawal, Case Crime No. 361 of 1999, Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, against Shiv Bhajan @ Babloo and Case Crime No. 362 of 1999, Section 3 (1) of U.P. Gangster & Anti-So
Attorney General for India vs. Amratlal Prajivandas
Builders Supply Corpn. vs. Union of India
Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala
Smt. Kahkashan Parveen vs. State of U.P. 1999 (2) ACR 1762 (DB)
Smt. Maina Devi vs. State of U.P. 2013 (9) ADJ 542
State of A.P. vs. C. Uma Maheswara Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.