DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
CHAUHARYA TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
L. I. C. OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
In these appeals, the seminal question that emerges for consideration is whether the High Court of Allahabad in Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.21164 of 1998 has justifiably overturned the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) on the singular foundation that the aggrieved persons, at whose instance a reference was made under Sections 10(1) and 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, ‘the Act'), was not adjudicable by the tribunal, for the aggrieved persons were working as Development Officers in the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) and hence, they could be treated as workmen under the schematic context of the Act and, therefore, the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to deal with the lis in question.
2. Regard being had to the aforesaid issue, we are not required to state the facts in detail. Suffice it to state that the Central Government had made a reference, vide notification MO E-17012/35/89-iB(B) dated 4.12.1989, of the following dispute for adjudication :
“Whether the action of the management of LIC of India in imposing penalty of reduction of salary of Shri R.C. Du
Mukesh K. Tripathi v. Senior Divisional Manager, LIC
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. R. Suresh
Workmen v. Indian Standards Institution
May & Baker (India) Ltd. v. Workmen
Western India Match Co. Ltd. v. Workmen
Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat
Punjab Land Development & Reclamation Corpn. Ltd. v. Labour Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.