1. Heard Shri Ravindra Prakash Srivastav, learned counsel for the revisionists, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, Shri Anoop Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and perused the records of the case.

2. This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 8.11.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (P.C. Act) Court no. 4, District-Gorakhpur in Sessions Trial No. 248 of 2016 (State Vs. Satendra Kumar Mishra and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 483 of 2014, under Section 498-A, 328, 323, 504 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Shahpur, District-Gorakhpur whereby the application moved by the revisionists for discharge under Section 498-A, 328, 323, 504 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act has been rejected and charge fixed for framing charges in the above mentioned sections.

3. The facts which are requisite to be stated for adjudication of this revision are that opposite party no. 2 has lodged a first information report against the revisionists on 21.10.2014 at about 23:30 o'clock which is registered as case crime no. 483 of 2014, under Sections 498-A, 328, 32