SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 648

RAN VIJAI SINGH, VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA III
MEDHA AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Samir Sharma for the Appellants; Saral Srivastava for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This claimants’ appeal, for enhancement of the awarded amount, has been filed against the award/judgment and decree dated 11th February, 2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/IVth Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 205 of 2001 (Smt. Medha Aggarwal and others v. The New India Insurance Company Ltd. and another), by which the claim petition was partly allowed and the opposite party was directed to pay Rs. 5,25,000/- as compensation with 9% interest.

2. The award has been challenged on number of grounds; namely, (a) the Tribunal has erred in deducting the conveyance allowance, house rent allowance, education allowance, etc. from the income of the appellants; (b) the Tribunal has also erred in using the multiplier of 10; whereas, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, 2009 (2) TAC 677 SC, multiplier of 14 ought to have been applied as the age of the deceased was 44 years at the time of accident; and (c) the Tribunal has erred in



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top