SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 733

P.K.S.BAGHEL
DEEPCHAND – Appellant
Versus
PHOOLCHAND MANJHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajeev Kumar Singh for the Appellant; Abhishek Misra for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—This is defendant’s second appeal under Section 100 C.P.C.

2. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent for permanent injunction, the defendant has filed the present second appeal.

3. The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering in his suit property shown in the plaint map as letters Ka, Kha, Ga, Gha. The further relief sought that during the pendency of the suit, the construction raised by the defendant be removed and the possession of the plaintiff be restored.

4. The plaintiff’s case was that the suit property was a Deeh. Its original owner was Gulab and Laxmi both sons of late Musai Manjhi, resident of Mauja Tedhabeer, Tappa Panchwara Pargana Havali, Tehsil Campiarganj, District Gorakhpur. It was their ancestral property. They have shifted to another district. On 31.5.1996 and 3.5.1999, they have executed an unregistered deed in presence of some respectable persons of the village and issued a receipt and also executed a Yaadastnama on 5.6.2012. Since, the plaintiff was in employment, outside of the village, about 15 y

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top