S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
P. Chandrasekharan – Appellant
Versus
S. Kankarajan – Respondent
Please provide the legal document content (inside
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J : —
1.Leave granted.
2.Plaintiffs in the suit are Appellants before us. They filed a suit which was marked as OS No.1132 of 1974; in all 10 reliefs were prayed for. We are concerned herein with reliefs no.8 and 9. Relief no.8 was in respect of a land admeasuring 15-1/2 ft. x 21 ft. whereas relief no.9 was in respect of a land admeasuring 40 ft. × 20 ft. The said lands were allegedly purchased by the predecessor in interest of the appellants by a deed of sale dated 16.9.1935. In the said deed of sale the properties in question have been described as under :
“In Tiruchirappalli District, Srirangam Sub District, Tiruchirappalli Taluk, Thimmarayasamudhram Village, Srirangam Municipal Second Ward, Ayan Punja, in T.S. No.1960/1, out of 24 cents the 8 cents on the western side, Ayan Punja in T.S. No.1960/4 out of 6 cents, 3 cents on western side, within this a thatched house vacant site including the brick wall, door on the east to west side etc. along with common pathway rights in the above T.S. Nos. belongs to the property for 8 cents set out about four boundaries are as follows:
NORTH of Velayutham Pillai land ;
SOUTH of Rajarethinam Pillai land ;
WEST of Pitchaikar
Mithailal Dalsangar Singh & Ors. v. Annabai Devram Kini & Ors. [(2003) 10 SCC 691] (Para 22)
Rev. Fr. M.S. Poulose v. Varghese & Ors. [1995 Supp. (2) SCC 294] (Para14)
Hero Vinoth v. Seshammal [(2006) 5 SCC 545] (Para 6)
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. Vijay Dasharath Patel [2007 (4) SCALE 132] (Para 17)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.