SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
MANORMA DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH KUMAR KHANNA – Respondent
Hon’ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.—Heard Shreya Gupta, learned counsel for defendant No. 1-petitioner/tenant and Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for the plaintiffs-respondents/landlords.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for the following relief:
“to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned judgement and order dated 31.5.2017 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 14, Kanpur Nagar in Rent Appeal Misc. Case No. 417/74/2017 (Annexure-8 to the instant writ petition) and the judgement and order dated 4.3.2010 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 14, Kanpur Nagar in Rent Appeal No. 20 of 2001 (Annexure-6 to the instant writ petition.”
FACTS OF THE CASE
3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that plaintiffs-respondents/landlords had purchased the House No. 8/11, Arya Nagar, Kanpur Nagar by a sale-deed dated 31.3.1992, which was registered on 20.4.1992 in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Kanpur. Thus, the plaintiffs-respondents became owner and landlord of the aforesaid disputed house. On the ground of bona fide need, the plaintiffs-respondents filed a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.