SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1094

SUNITA AGARWAL
LEKHRAJ – Appellant
Versus
C. C. R. A. U. P. ALLD. /BOARD OF REVENUE U. P. ALLD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
V.K. Singh, B.K. Srivastava, Dhiraj Srivastava and M.N. Singh for the Petitioners; C.S.C. and A.K. Mehrotra for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J.—Heard Ms. Soumya Srivastava and Sri Dhiraj Srivastava, learned counsels for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. This writ petition is directed against the orders dated 6.12.2001 and 28.9.1998 passed by respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 2; respectively, in a matter arising out of the proceedings initiated under Section 33/47 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Brief facts relevant to decide the controversy at hands are that a registered agreement for levy of Toll Tax over Toll bridge namely Ambala-Saharanpur-Mussoorie Road new Hindan Bridge near Gagalheri, District Saharanpur was executed in favour of the petitioners, partners of the firm known as M/s Lekhraj and others for a period of one year in view of settlement of auction for Rs. 1,00,03,100/-. The stamp duty of Rs. 5,50,192.50/- was paid by the petitioners thereon. The letter dated 7.11.1988 handing over charge for levy of Toll Tax was issued in favour of the petitioners by the Public Works Department. After execution of the contract, the petitioners s





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top