DEVI PRASAD SINGH, ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI
Ram Krishna Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Devi Prasad Singh, J.
1. Instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred challenging the impugned order dated 28.4.2012 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) by which petitioners' application for renewal of the retail kerosene oil licence under one time licence scheme has been rejected. The petitioners were having kerosene oil licence under UP Kerosene Control Order 1962 (in short control order) for Nigohan, Rampur Garhi Jamuni, Bhawakhera, Udaipur, Brahmdaspur, Karanpur and Baghauhna. In the year 1991 the petitioners had applied for renewal of licence under Rule 8(2) of the Control Order (supra). Application moved by the petitioner seems to be not considered hence, he filed a Writ Petition No. 96 of 1991. The order of renewal was refused on 26.11.1991. Hence, petitioner preferred another writ petition bearing no. 3973 (MB) 1991 in which interim orders were passed on 6.12.1991 and 20.12.1991 providing therein that in case license for quota has not been cancelled, modified or suspended, the respondent shall continue to supply kerosene oil for the purpose of distribution to the consumers. However, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous al
Dhananjay Sharma v. State of Haryana
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar v. State of Maharashtra : (1974) 1 SCC 317 [Para 27]
Ramrameshwari Devi and others v. Nirmala Devi and others
Royal Orchid Hotels Limited and another Vs. G. Jayaram Reddy and others
Shankara Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. M. Prabhakar and others : (2011) 5 SCC 607 [Para 27]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.