Hon’ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J. : Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. By means of the instant revision, the revisionist has challenged the concurrent finding of his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The revisionist was tried in Case No. 774 of 2008 (Lal Saheb Vs. Vinod Kumar) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh and by judgment dated 28.5.2011, he was held guilty for the aforementioned offence and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment, and fine of Rs. 5,000/- and also with compensation of Rs. 14,00,000/-. Fine imposed on him contained default stipulation of two months imprisonment. Feeling aggrieved by the aforementioned judgment of the trial court, the revisionist preferred criminal appeal no. 56 of 2011 and the learned Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh by his judgment dated 28.8.2012 partly allowed the appeal. Conviction of the revisionist was confirmed. The sentence imposed upon him was modified to the extent that the amount of Fine of Rs. 5,000/- and clause of default stipulation wa