SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 2257

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Surya Prakash Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Narendra Bhushan Nigam, Vinod Kumar Baranwal.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.

1. Heard Sri Narendra Bhushan Nigam, for the petitioners.

2. This petition has been filed, for setting aside the orders of Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) dated 01.12.2014, rejecting survey report submitted by Court Amin in the suit and Incharge District Judge, dated 14.12.2015, dismissing revision of the petitioners against the aforesaid order.

3. Mata Harakh alias Mata Harash (now represented by the petitioners) filed a suit (registered as Original Suit No. 99 of 1966) for possession over sub-plots 48 and 49 of abadi plot 1408 of village Kotwa, pargana Jhunsi, district Allahabad. It has been stated in plaint that Kamta son of Durga Prasad was owner of the land in dispute, in which in sub-plot 48 his house etc. was existing and sub-plot 49 was occupied as appurtenant land by him. Kamta was inherited by his adopted son Shri Kant, who executed a sale deed dated 21.10.1965 of the disputed land in favour of the plaintiff and handed over possession to him over it. The plaintiff was residing in Bombay in connection of his service, from where he retired in last of December 1965. Taking advantage of the absence of the plaintiff, the defendants demolish







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top