SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 2413

SUNITA AGARWAL
Ramesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Ran Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Nagendra Kumar Srivastava, Komal Agrawal.
For the Respondent: Sumit Daga.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Nagendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the judgments and orders passed by the Courts below dated 4.3.2009, 14.8.2015 and 24.11.2015 are under challenge.

3. The present petition arises out of the release proceeding namely P.A. Case No. 18 of 2005 (Ran Singh vs. Ramesh Chandra) instituted under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 for the release of shop no. 766/264 situated at Mohalla Hastinapur Road, near Jain Mandir, Mawana Kala, District Meerut. The need set up in the release application was for the landlord and his son to start a business. The ground of challenge to the order of the release in the present petition is that the Prescribed Authority/Judge Small Causes Court, Meerut had no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate the release application. The Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mawana was the designated Prescribed Authority for the area in question and, therefore, it was the only competent authority to entertain the release application.

4. The petitioner contested the matter by filing his written statement on 27.7.2006, ho

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top