SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1553

ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA-II
Shiv Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Munendra Kumar Pathak and Arun Kumar Pandey.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar Srivastava-II, J.

1. This is revision against the judgment and order dated 29.7.2005, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faizabad in Criminal Appeal No. 67/2002, whereby the judgment and order dated 08.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad in criminal case No. 1578/2002, arising out of crime No. 224/93, Police Station Poora Kalandar, District Faizabad, was confirmed wherein the accused-revisionist were convicted and sentenced under section 323, 325 IPC for six months’ simple imprisonment and one year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. According to the prosecution version, on 07.6.1993 at about 10: 00 AM when the complainant-injured Raja Ram Tiwari was passing through the ‘sahan darwaja’ of accused persons then accused Shiv Naik, Ram Naik and Raj Naik, who are real brothers, attacked him by ‘danda’ due to the old enmity. Injured sustained fracture and other injuries. Incident was seen by Mast Ram, Indrapal. A written report was submitted by the injured at police station Poora Kalandar on 07.6.1993 at 12: 05 wherein a case crim


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top