SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1580

K.P.SINGH
Saurabh Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Hari Om Khare.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

K.P. Singh, J.

1. Heard Shri Hari Om Khare, learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record of the case.

2. By means of this application, the applicants, who are husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law of the victim (deceased) have prayed for quashing of an order dated 12.7.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Meerut whereby the learned Judge framed the charges against the applicants in ST No. 765 of 2002, under sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Brahmpuri, district Meerut.

3. In brief, the facts of the case as set out in the FIR lodged by the informant Yogendra Pal Gupta, opposite party No. 2 on 20.11.1997 are that marriage of her daughter Smt. Neeru alias Moni was performed with Saurabh Gupta as per Hindu rites and rituals on 11.2.1997. After marriage the behaviours of the applicants was normal, but after some times his son-in-law Saurabh Gupta and his mother Smt. Raj Rani Gupta and father Indra Prakash Gupta beaten his daughter and kicked out her from home and asked her to bring colour T.V. and Rs. 50,000/- in cash. On the assurance of some relatives, he manag






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top