Anil Kumar, J. –

Heard Sri Satish Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel and perused the record.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of transfer dated 13.07.2015 passed by Consolidation Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow by which he has been transferred from the Sultanpur to Sonbhadra.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner while challenging impugned order also submits that as the petitioner's two daughters are studying at Sultanpur and if the petitioner is compelled to join at his transferred place at Sonbhadra in pursuance to the impugned order, the study of his children will suffer in the present era of competition, so the same is liable to be set aside.

4. In addition to above said facts, he further submits that petitioner's son is handicapped, so in view of the transfer policy which governs the field, the impugned order is contrary to the terms of transfer policy as well as in violation of principles of natural justice, liable to be set aside.

5. Sri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel while defending the impugned transfer order submits that the ground taken by learned counsel