SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3194

SUNEET KUMAR
Shivani Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :- Amit Daga
For the Opposite Party :- A.G.A.

JUDGMENT

Suneet Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

This application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of the Criminal Complaint Case No. 5 of 2014 (Prem Kumar and others Versus Shivani Tyagi), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'N.I. Act'), pending in the court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate-9, Kanpur Nagar.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the opposite parties no. 2 to 5 filed a complaint against the applicant alleging that the accused persons are partners of a firm M/s Fashion Plus engaged in the business of ready made garments in brand name 'CAT 'N' LILL" & 'SONA'. As per the terms of the investor agreement the opposite party had to deposit Rs. 11,65000/- with the firm towards security for the material which would be provided by the franchise firm/company. The deposit was refundable. It is alleged that each of the opposite party paid their share towards security in cash. Subsequently, the accused persons closed their franchise and returned the security sum by issuing cheques to each of the opposite party for the same amount on 08 January 2013. On presentation, all the cheques were dishonored




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top