SUNITA AGARWAL
S. U. Ashram – Appellant
Versus
ADJ – Respondent
Sunita Agarwal, J. –
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 337196 of 2014
2. Delay in filing the restoration application has been sufficiently explained.
The delay condonation application is allowed.
3. Delay condoned.
Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J. - Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 337204 of 2014
The reason given for non appearance of the learned counsel for the appellant is sufficient.
2. The restoration application is allowed. The order dated 7.7.2006 is hereby recalled.
3. The writ petition is restored to its original number.
Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, J. - The writ petition is restored to its original number.
2. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.
3. Heard Shri K.M. Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deeba Siddiqui, learned counsel for the respondent-landlord.
4. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the orders of release of the shop in question which exists in a place known as Mandawar situated near the District Headquarters of Bijnor. The release application was filed in the year 1989 on the ground that the applicant-landlord required the shop in question for his business. It was categorically stated in paragraph 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.