Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This civil revision under Section 115 Code of Civil Procedure assails an order passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Lucknow on 07.12.2013 contained in (annexure No.15) filed alongwith the revision, whereby the application filed by the revisionist, seeking extension of time for complying with the order dated 29.08.2013 to the extent of providing surety was rejected. Although by an order dated 29.08.2013 the original award rendered on 31.08.2012 by an exparte order was recalled subject to three conditions: -

(i) Application has been allowed on the cost of Rs. 2000/-.

(ii) The revisionist shall furnish an undertaking regarding the awarded amount.

(iii) The revisionist shall file surety regarding the awarded amount.

3. The revisionist is stated to have complied with the first two conditions, however, filing surety in respect of claim allowed was not complied within the time specified in the order dated 29.08.2013 and consequently the revisionist filed an application for extension of time which has been rejected by order dated 07.12.2013 impugned in the present revision. On a questi