SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 4001

P.K.S.BAGHEL
Digendra Sen – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Qazi Mohd.Ahmad
For the Respondent:- C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel, J.

The petitioner is a Form Superintendent at Government Agricultural Form Baijnathpur, District Mainpuri. He moved an application to second respondent for his transfer from Mainpuri to Etawah on the ground of illness of his wife on 25.05.2016. Upon his application the third respondent issued the transfer order dated 29.06.2016 whereby the petitioner was transferred from Mainpuri to Etawah and in his place one Shri Krishna Pal Singh was transferred from Etawah to Agra. Later vide order dated 22.07.2016 the aforesaid transfer order dated 29.06.2016 was cancelled/ modified. Consequently, Krishna Pal Singh remained at Etawah and the petitioner was transferred to Agra. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner has instituted this writ proceeding.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that transfer order was cancelled at the behest of the sitting M.L.A. However, in the writ petition there is no fact mentioned about the intervention of the M.L.A. in the matter. Krishna Pal Singh, who was transferred from Etawah to Agra, also preferred Writ Petition No. 22172 (S/S) of 2016(Krishna Pal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others), challenging his t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top