SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2254

VIJAY LAKSHMI
MUNTAZIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Jagdish Prasad Mishra for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi, J.—The applicant, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the order dated 17.6.2017 passed by the A.C.J.M. Court No. 2, Muzaffar Nagar, in Case Crime No. 352 of 2017, under Section 420 I.P.C. and Section 60 Excise Act, P.S. Charthawal, district Muzaffar Nagar, whereby the application moved by the applicant for release of his vehicle/Tractor Trolley bearing Registration No. UP 11AP 4837 has been rejected. Prayer has also been made to quash the order dated 10.8.2017 passed by Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar, in Criminal Revision No. 161 of 2017, Muntazir v. State of U.P. filed against the aforesaid order of learned A.C.J.M. rejecting the release application, has been confirmed by the learned revisional Court.

2. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties.

3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. on behalf of opposite parties. Perused the records.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is the registered owner of the tractor trolley involved in this case. The applicant is neither named in the FIR nor any














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top