SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2301

RAMESH SINHA, VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
PANKAJ JAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vikram Chaudhary and Shiv Sagar Singh for the Petitioner; A.S.G.I., Amit Misra and Sabhajeet Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ramesh Sinha, J.—Sri Sabhajeet Singh, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of Union of India today in Court, which is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Vikram Chaudhary, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sabhajeet Singh, learned counsel for Union of India, Sri Amit Misra, learned counsel for the C.B.I. and perused the material on record.

3. This writ petition has been filed by by the petitioner with a prayer to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring in the above context, the use of word ‘may’ in Section 88 of Cr.P.C. as unconstitutional, manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and ultra vires of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 12 & 21 of the Constitution of India or in the alternative to read it down by expounding, deliberating and delineating its scope in the context, to save Section 88 from unconstitutionality on the vice of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. A further prayer has also been made in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the impugned order dated 7.12.2017 passed by the trial Court, i.e., Special Judge for Anti Corruption C.B.I. cases a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top