SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 115

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
KANCHAN BALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Siddharth Khare, Ashok Khare and Shantanu Khare for the Petitioners; C.S.C. and Ashok Kumar Yadav for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.—Heard Shri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Siddharth Khare, Alok Mishra for the petitioners and Shri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Dr. Rajeshwar Tripathi, CSC-II and Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, ACSC for the State respondents as well as Shri Ashok Kumar Yadav for Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad.

2. In this group of cases, the petitioners have prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to get their answer sheets of U.P. Teachers’ Eligibility Test-2017 (in brevity, TET 2017) evaluated and to declare their result of TET 2017 after rectifying the mistake. In Writ A Nos. 1713 of 2018 and 1868 of 2018 the petitioners have prayed for evaluating question Nos. 41 and 50 of the question booklet series and award the marks of the said questions to them.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Writ A No. 841 of 2018 are being noted below :

4. Kanchan Bala and 172 others are before this Court with the following prayer :

“(i) a writ, o



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top