KRISHNA MURARI, AJAY BHANOT
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Krishna Murari, J.—Issue raised in this writ petition for adjudication is in respect of the format of the ballot paper to be used by the members of the Kshetra Panchayat for the purposes of voting in a meeting to consider the motion of No Confidence.
2. Heard Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Arvind Kumar Singh appearing for respondents.
3. Facts, as unfolded in the pleading, go to show that there are 74 elected members of Kshetra Panchayat, Marehra, District Etah. Petitioner is an elected Pramukh. A motion for No Confidence was tabled signed by 42 members of the Kshetra Panchayat. District Magistrate, Etah issued a notice fixing 4.9.2017 for holding the meeting to consider the motion of No Confidence. A representation was made by the petitioner alleging that out of 42 members, who have signed the motion of No Confidence, 17 members since did not subscribe to the oath, as such, ceased to be members and, thus, the motion of No Confidence does not conform to the requirements of Section 15 (2) of the U.P. Khsetra Panchayat and Zila Pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.