SIDDHARTHA VARMA
RISHI PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Siddhartha Varma, J.—The petitioners who are nine in number were allotted pattas vide lease documents dated 27.10.1992. The pattas were preceded by Munadi, resolution and approval as is provided in the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the Rules of 1952. When in the year 2003-04, one Hardas filed a complaint against the allotment of the pattas, notices were issued to the petitioners who replied to the show-cause notices. Thereafter the pattas, were cancelled vide order dated 1.6.2011 and the Revision which the petitioners filed was also dismissed on 23.3.2012. Before the actual cancellation order was passed, the complaint as was filed by Hardas was dismissed in default. Hardas never filed any restoration application but a restoration application was filed by the District Government Counsel (D.G.C.) on behalf of the State. The case proceeded when the restoration application of the D.G.C. was allowed and the order of dismissal was recalled on 8.9.2005. The Additional Collector cancelled the pattas on 6.5.2006. The petitioners alongwith other pattedars filed a Revision which was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the Additional C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.