SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2448

SIDDHARTHA VARMA
HARI SHANKAR KUSHWAHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Chaturvedi and A.C. Misra for the Petitioners; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma, J.

The petitioners were granted pattas on 11.6.1996 and they were also approved by the Collector on 16.6.1996. However, on the complaint of some political leaders, the collector issued notices to the petitioners and initiated proceedings under Section 198(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Notices were issued on 18.3.1997. Replies were submitted by the petitioners on 21.6.1999. A report was called for by the Assistant Collector to whom the Collector had transferred the case, which was submitted by the Naib-tehsildar. Thereafter, the Additional Collector on 27.5.2002 cancelled the patta of the petitioners, who filed a revision which was also dismissed on 31.8.2006. Aggrieved thereof, the petitioners filed the instant writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the political leaders who had made the complaints against the pattas of the petitioners were not "aggrieved persons" under the Act. He further submitted that the Tehsildar was not entitled to give a report and the Collector himself ought to have enquired into the matter. In the end the pet










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top