SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2555

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
HARI KISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Gautam Baghel, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Karuna Nand Bajpayee, J.

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of applicants against the summoning order dated 8.6.2016 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur in Complaint Case No.1215/2014 (Rakesh Kumar v. Hari Kishan) u/s 302, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Sehramau South, District-Shahjahanpur and also against the order dated 16.01.2016 passed by Additional Session Judge, Shahjahanpur in Criminal Revision No.164/2016, which was preferred against the summoning order dated 8.6.2016 and has been dismissed.

2. Shri Yogesh Kumar Vaish, Advocate filed his power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.

3. Heard Shri Gautam Baghel, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Yogesh Kumar Vaish, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 and also learned Additional Government Advocate.

4. Brief facts as emerge from the pleadings of petition are that one First Information Report was lodged on 01.07.2013 at 3.15 a.m. by opposite party no.2 against three applicants Hari Kishan, Golu alias Durvendra and Pradeep and one another person Satgur. The said F.I.R. was registered as Case Crime No.139 of 2013, u/s 30







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top