ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA II
SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA II, J.
1. Heard Sri G.S.Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. Opposite party No. 2 is represented through counsel but none is present on his behalf, although counter affidavit has been filed on his behalf.
3. The instant petition under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed with the prayer to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 449 of 2007, Deepak Srivastava v. Sunil Bharti Mittal and others under section 420/406 Indian Pena Code (In short 'IPC'), Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 36, Lucknow and the impugned orders dated 13.08.2007 and 16.1.2008 passed by the learned Magistrate summoning the accused petitioners to face the trial under section 420 IPC.
4. A complaint was filed by opposite party No. 2 against the petitioners stating that the petitioners are connected and working for each other in Airtel Company and are responsible for the business, affairs and policies of the company. The petitioner No. 1 is Chairman
Aneeta Hada Vs. Ghodfather Travels and Tours (P) (Ltd.)
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust Vs. India Infoline Ltd.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
Maksud Saiyed Vs. State of Gujarat
Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Judicial Magistrate
S.M.S. Phamaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Neeta Bhalla, (2005) 8 SCC 89 SCC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.