SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1344

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
BEFORE : RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA) AND UMESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, JJ.
SHEO BAHADUR SINGH AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal Nos. 4123, 3704 of 2008 and 688 of 2010 decided on 24th August, 2018)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Pt. Sita Ram Vishwakarma, Sushil Kumar Dwivedi, Manish Tiwary, Ashwini Kumar Awasthi, Ajay Singh, Ramesh Prasad and Sushil Kumar Dwivedi for the Appellants; G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(A) (Indian) Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 149 – Murder – Unlawful assembly – Common object – Overt act – Informant’s younger brother and cousin were returning to their residence and when they reached in front of house of R where K, S, B and V were sitting – K abused R which was objected to by latter leading to an altercation between them – Suddenly accused fired on deceased due to which latter sustained injuries and died later on – Therefore it cannot be said that all other accused were intended to kill deceased or there was any unlawful assembly of accused to commit an offence – There is no evidence showing that except accused appellant any other accused was either intended to kill deceased or had any knowledge about intention of accused to kill deceased – Participation of all other accused in commission of offence doubtful – Hence conviction and sentence of other accused appellants under Sections 302 read with 149 set aside. [Paras 51, 54 and 55]

       (B) Arms Act, 1959 – Sections 3, 30 – Licence – Fire Arms – Breach of condition – Appellant carrying licensed gun of his brother (licensed holder) in his presence for use of his brother – There is no evidence showing that licensed holder had authorZed appellant to use his licensed gun – Hence licensed holder not contravened any condition and not liable to be punished under Section 30 – Conviction and sentence set aside. [Para 60]

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi, J.—These three criminal appeals have arisen out of a common judgment and order dated 29.5.2008/31.5.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-I, Banda in Sessions Trial No. 258 of 2003 (State v. Kulpat Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 41 of 2003, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and Sessions Trial No. 259 of 2003 (State v. Sheo Bahadur Singh and another), arising out of Crime Nos. 42 of 2003 and 43 of 2003, under Sections 25 and 30 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1959’) Police Station - Tindwari, District - Banda whereby the appellants - Sheo Bahadur Singh, Swayamvar Singh, Vinesh Singh, Ram Das Singh and Kulpat Singh, all residents of Machahar Amlikaur, Police Station - Tindwari, District - Banda were convicted and sentenced, details whereof are given herein below :

(i) Appellants - Sheo Bahadur Singh, Swayambar Singh, Vinesh Singh, Ram Das Singh and Kulpat Singh were convicted and sentenced as follows :

i. Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 3,000/- each, under Section 302 read with Section 149 of IPC.

ii. Rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, under Section 325 read with Section 149 of IPC.

(ii) Appellants - Swayambar Singh, Vinesh Singh, Ram Das Singh and Kulpat Singh were convicted under Section 147 of IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for one year each.

(iii) Appellant - Sheo Bahadur Singh was convicted under Section 148 of IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years.

(iv) Appellant - Sheo Bahadur Singh was convicted under Section 25 of Act, 1959 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- .

(v) Appellant - Swayambar Singh was convicted under Section 30 of Act, 1959 and sentenced to imprisonment for three months.

In case of default in payment of fine, all the appellants shall undergo additional imprisonment for six months each.

2. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. Stream of events culminating into lodging of the first information report, as discernible from the perusal of record, appears to be that on 18.3.2003, informant Raj Bahadur Singh’s younger brother Ram Bahadur Singh and cousin Raj Kumar Singh s/o Ram Nahor Singh, residents of Amlikaur, Police Station - Tindwari, District - Banda were returning to their residence from the residence of Ram Asrey s/o Keshan Singh after having meals in his house on the occasion of festival of ‘Holi’. While returning, they reached in front of house of Ram Das Singh s/o Ram Kishun Singh, where Kulpat Singh s/o Shripal Singh, Sheo Bahadur Singh and Swayambar Singh, sons of Sheo Vinod Singh and Vinesh Singh s/o Sheo Bhawan Singh were sitting. Kulpat Singh abused Ram Bahadur Singh, which was objected to by the latter. This lead to an altercation between them. Thereafter, Sheo Bahadur Singh, Swayambar Singh, Vinesh Singh and Ram Das Singh, all started abusing the Ram Bahadur Singh and Raj Kumar Singh. On hearing the verbal spat, informant Raj Bahadur Singh rushed to the spot alongwith this younger brother Shiv Bahadur @ Chota. At about 9.45 P.M., accused Sheo Bahadur Singh, with the intention to kill Ram Bahadur Singh, fired on him with the licensed gun of his brother Swayambar Singh. The fire hit Ram Bahadur Singh, due to which he fell on the ground. Thereafter Kulpat Singh, Swayambar Singh, Ram Das Singh and Vinesh Singh started doing ‘marpeet’ (assault) with the opposite party, due to which Shiv Bahadur @ Chota s/o Babbu Singh and Raj Kumar sustained injuries. On hue and cry being raised, several villagers reached on the spot, whereafter the accused fled away from the spot, threatening to kill them. Thereafter, with the help of the villagers, all the three injured were taken to Benda Ghat on bullock cart, from where they were send to police station on the tractor of Shyam Sundar Singh. On the way, informa


































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top