SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1606

J.J.MUNIR
Fazil @ Avesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Narendra Deo Shukla, Adv., Umesh Chandra Prajapati, Adv., Vikas Tiwari, Adv.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. Heard Sri N.D. Shukla, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Vikas Tiwari appearing for O.P.No.2 and Sri Kamal Singh Yadav, learned AGA appearing for the State.

2. This criminal revision is directed against an order of Sri Pushker Upadhyay, Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court, 1st, Jhansi dated 01.12.2017 dismissing the criminal appeal no. 12/2017 and affirming an order of the Juvenile Justice Board, Jhansi dated 27.10.2017 passed in Bail Application No. 69/2017 relating to Case Crime No. 396 of 2016, under Sections 354B, 323, 324, 506 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act, P.S. Mauranipur, District Jhansi refusing bail to the applicant who claimed as a juvenile under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

3. The brief facts giving rise to the present revision are that the first informant-opposite party no.2 lodged an FIR with regard to an occurrence dated 20.09.2016 at 9:00 in the evening hours saying that his daughters Rakhi and Nishi besides his wife Usha had all gone to the Mela at Jalvihar and were proceeding to the Mela ground in Mauranipur when they were stoppe


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top