SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 169

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, JJ.
LALJI GUPTA - Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF U.P. - Respondent
Jail Appeal No. 3457 of 2013
Decided on : 12-02-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Alpana Dwivedi, Adv., Saiyad Ali Murtaza, Adv.

The burden of explanation lies on the accused when circumstances point to their involvement in the crime, and the establishment of motive is crucial in cases based on circumstantial evidence.

Headnote:

Conviction - Murder - Section 302 I.P.C. - [MURDER] - [CRIMINAL LAW] - [Section 302 I.P.C.]

Fact of the Case:

The appellant Lalji Gupta was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife Poonam. The prosecution's case was based on the allegation that Lalji Gupta had mixed a poisonous substance in the medicine of Poonam, resulting in her death. The witnesses, including the daughter of the deceased, testified to seeing Lalji Gupta tampering with the medicine and the subsequent events leading to Poonam's death. The appellant denied the allegations and claimed innocence, but his statements were inconsistent and evasive.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellant guilty of murder based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimonies. The court noted that the motive for the crime was established by the appellant's alcohol addiction, property disputes, and previous acts of cruelty towards the deceased. The court also emphasized the appellant's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for the events surrounding the death of Poonam. The court held that the prosecution had successfully proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and affirmed the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Issues: The key issues in the case included the appellant's involvement in the death of his wife, the credibility of witness testimonies, and the establishment of motive for the crime.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle that the burden of explanation lies on the accused when circumstances point to their involvement in the crime. The court also emphasized the importance of motive in cases based on circumstantial evidence. Additionally, the court highlighted the significance of witness testimonies, noting that interested witnesses cannot be discarded solely on the ground of their interest in the case.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant's conviction and sentence for murder were affirmed. The court directed the appellant to serve out the sentence imposed by the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

This appeal under section 383 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by convict appellant Lalji Gupta through Senior Superintendent, Central Jail, Varanasi, against judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.11.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Basti, in S.T. No. 15 of 2005, State Vs. Lalji Gupta, arising out of Case Crime No. 468 of 2004, under section 302 I.P.C., P.S. Rudhauli, District Basti, whereby appellant Lalji Gupta has been convicted and sentenced with life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2000/- for offence of murder punishable under section 302 I.P.C. and in default in making payment of fine further R.I. of one month was awarded.

2. The very perusal of the impugned judgment and Trial Court's record reveals that first information report (exhibit Ka2) was lodged by Rajesh son of Ram Shanker, resident of Raja Bazar, P.S. Purani Basti, District Basti, at Police Station Rudhauli, District Basti, on 5.7.2004 at 22.50 hours against Lalji Gupta, son of Late Ram Shanker, resident of Mudiyar Chauraha, P.S. Rudhauli, District Basti, for offence punishable under section 306 I.P.C. with allegation that informant's sister Poonam was married, three years back, with Lalji Gupta. She was blessed with a girl aged about one year. Her husband was liquor addict and owing to it he started selling all his properties including house. This was protested by her. He was intending to sell his residential house for which, an advance was taken by him. Poonam was pressurised for it. On 5.7.2004 at 12.00 P.M. elder brother of Lalji namely Triveni alias Kichchi informed him that Poonam has consumed some medicine at 7.00 A.M. and owing to this she was vomiting. She was taken to P.H.C. Rudhauli and was under treatment. Informant along with his mother rushed at P.H.C. Rudhauli and found Poonam to have been taken to District Hospital, Basti, and when he was on the way to District Hospital, Basti, family members of Lalji met him near Malviya Tiraha and apprised him that Poonam succumbed before reaching Hospital. Her dead body was taken back to 'Mudiyar Chauraha' and this information was lodged at police station for taking legal recourse. Investigation proceeded by way of inquest proceeding and autopsy examination of dead body. It was found to be death owing to presence of Oregano Chloral Insecticide poison in viscera in Forensic Science Laboratory report (Ext. Ka-7). Investigation resulted in filing of charge-sheet, over which the Magistrate took cognizance for offence punishable u/s 306 I.P.C.

3. As the offence was exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, hence the file was committed to the Court of Sessions where the Presiding Officer of Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Basti, vide order dated 27.4.2005 leveled charge against Lalji Gupta for offence punishable u/s 306 I.P.C., which was read over and explained to accused, who pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Subsequently the Presiding Officer of Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Basti, vide order dated 2.8.2006 amended the charge and framed the charge as follows:

^^eSa vfuy dqekj] vij l= U;k;k/kh'k] dksVZ ua0 3] cLrh] vki vfHk;qDr ykyth xqIrk ij fuEufyf[kr vkjksi yxkrk gwWA

;g fd fnukad 5-7-04 dks le; 7-00 cts lqcg LFkku eqfM;kj frjkgk] Fkkuk :/kkSyh] tuin cLrh esa vki }kjk ?kj esa j[kh iwue dh nok ftls og MkDVj }kjk fn;s x;s nok ds :i esa jkst ihrh Fkh] vkius e`rdk dks tku ls ekjus dh uh;r ls lk vk'k; mlds nok esa tgjhyk inkFkZ feykdj fn;k tks e`rdk }kjk nok le>dj ih;k x;k vkSj mldh e`R;q gks x;hA bl izdkj vkids }kjk e`rdk ds nok esa tgjhyk inkFkZ feykdj mldh gR;k dj fn;kA bl izdkj vkius ,slk dk;Z fd;k tks /kkjk 302 Hkk0 n0 fo0 ds vUrZxr n.Muh; vijk/k gS tks bl U;k;ky; ds izlaKku esa gSA

,rn }kjk eSa funsZf'kr djrk gqW fd mijksDr vkjksi esa vki dk ijh{k.k bl U;k;y; }kjk fd;k tk;A^^


“I, Anil Kumar, Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Basti, frame following charge against you accused Lalji Gupta































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top