SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 271

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Santosh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Prem Narain Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ravi Shanker Shukla, Adv., Ajai Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Adnan Ahmad, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.

The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed to set aside the order dated 1.1.2019 passed by the IInd Additional District Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Lucknow in Civil Revision No.84 of 2017 filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow on 31.5.2017 in Misc. Case No.245 of 2016, whereby the executing court had dismissed the objections of the defendant/judgment debtor filed under Section 47 C.P.C.

2. The petitioner is the tenant/judgment debtor in a suit for possession and damages being Regular Suit No.167 of 1999. The trial court decreed the suit on 31.5.2011. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree, the petitioner/defendant filed first appeal bearing no.140 of 2011 in the court of Additional District Judge, Court No.17, Lucknow, which too was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 19.3.2016. After the judgment and decree, the decree holder has filed Execution Case No.10 of 2011. The petitioner has filed Second Appeal No.260 of 2016 before this Court along with an application for condonation of delay. In the execution case, t








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top