HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.
VIDYAWATI AND ANOTHER - Appellant
Versus
RAM JANKI AND OTHERS - Respondent
First Appeal No. 425 of 1978
Decided on : 24-04-2019
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashuthosh Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants-defendant Nos.6 and 10 and Sri R.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the plaintiffs-respondents Nos.1, 2, 3 and 4.
2. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed praying to set aside the judgment dated 29.09.1978 in O.S. No.23 of 1972 (partition suit) passed by the IIIrd Additional District and Session Judge, Banda.
3. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that one Sri Lal Man had purchased plot Nos.1628/1 and 1628/2, situate in Village Bhawani Poorva, Muhal Shekh Yusuf Ujjama, District Banda (hereinafter refer to as "suit property") by a registered sale deed dated 08.07.1924 from Shekh Madarazzami S/o Yusuf Ujjama for Rs.3600/- for construction of a Dharmshala at Railway Station Road.
4. The aforesaid Lal Man had the only issue as his daughter Smt. Sukhdei, who was married to one Ram Prasad. Smt. Sukhdei had three sons namely Sri Ram Krishna (married to Smt. Mahadeiya-defendant No.10), Mata Prasad (plaintiff) and Bhagwan Das (defendant No.1). Ram Krishna had three sons, namely Badri Prasad (defendant No.2), Kedar Nath (defendant No.3), Krishna Chandra (defendant No.4) and five daughters, namely Kamla Bai (defendant No.5), Vidyawati (defendant No.6), Munni Bai (defendant No.7), Chunni Bai (defendant No.8) and Vimla Bai (defendant No.9). The original plaintiff- Mata Prasad- the second son of Sukhdei, had only one issue, i.e. the daughter Smt. Ram Janki (plaintiff No.1/1). She was married to Harish Chandra Gupta. She had three sons, namely Akhilesh Chandra (plaintiff No.1/2), Dinesh Chandra (plaintiff No.1/3) and Rajendra Kumar (plaintiff No.1/4).
5. The third son of Smt. Sukhdei was Bhagwan Das who had four sons, namely Kailash Nath (defendant No.1/1), Dasharath Kumar (defendant No.1/2), Naresh Kumar (defendant No.1/3), Suresh Kumar (defendant No.1/4), and two daughters, namely Kumari Manjjoo (defendant No.1/5), and Smt. Santosh (defendant No.1/6).
6. The aforesaid Lal Man had filed a partition Suit No.42 of 1923 in the Court of Special Judge, Banda on 26.06.1923 for partition of family properties. During pendency of aforesaid Suit No.42 of 1923, he executed a registered Will deed dated 09.07.1923 (Exb.A11) in favour of his aforesaid three maternal grandsons, namely Sri Ram Krishna, Mata Prasad and Bhagwan Das, in respect of his entire properties in possession or which may be received in suit or by other means. The aforesaid registered Will deed dated 09.07.1923 is reproduced below:
**vly nLrkost LVkEi ew0 flyflyk ua0 & 6 lu~ 1923 bZ0 eufd ykyeu mQZ yYyw oYn jke izlkn dkSe oS'; iqjokj lkfdu 'kgj ckank eqgYyk dkyouxat dk gwaA feueqfdj o ckyd`".k tks fd iksrk feueqfdj ds fcjknj gdhdh dk gS o ds'kksnkl tks fd gdhdh Hkrhtk feueqfdj dk gS esEcjku fgUnw [kkunku eq'rdkZ ds Fks vkSj vlkZ feueqfdj bu yksxks ls rdlhe tk;nkn dh ckcr bljkj djrk jgk exj bu yksxks us ,d u lquh fcykf[kj feueqfdj us etcwj gksdj ukfy'k uEcjh 42 lu~ 1923 vnkyr lc tth ckank es ckcr rdlhe tk;nkn [kkunkuh crkjh[k 26 twu 1923 bZ0 nk;j dj nh gS vkSj eqdnek etdwj vHkh vnkyr ekSlwQ esa py jgk gS bl rjg ls feu eqfdj vius nwljs esEcjku ls dkuwuu vygnk gks x;k gS vkSj feueqfdj dks dkuwuu og v[kR;kjkr viuh tk;nkn dh ckcr tks feueqfdj ds dCtk esa gS ;k tks o eqdnes rdlhe eqrtfDdjk okyk feu eqfdj dks feysxh gkfly gS tks fd equQflek esEcj dks gkfly gksrs gS pwafd feueqfdj cgqr tbZQ gS vkSj rUnq#Lrh Hkh feu eqfdj dh vPNh ugh jgrh gS vkSj bl ftUnxkuh ik;nkl dk dqN Hkjkslk ugh ekyqe ugh fdl oDr [kRe gks tkos vkSj ckn cQkr feueqfdj Qtwy >xMs ckcr tk;nkn vtku feu eqfdj iSnk gks vkSj tk;nkn cjckn gks pqukfp feu eqfdj o lsgr rQl lokr vDy fcyk fdlh ncko ds viuh dqy tk;nkn tks feu eqfdj ds dCts esa gS ;k vkbUnk tks ctfj;s eqdnekr rdlhe eqrtfDdjk okyk feueqfdj dks feys ;k fdlh nwljs rjhdk ls feys mldks fuLor feu eqfdj gLo tSy fgnk;r crkSj olh;r djrk gSA 1- ;gfd tc rd feueqfdj ftUnk jgsxk feueqfdj dks iwjk v[kR;kj viuh tk;nkn ds bLrseky o eqUrfdy djus d
Arunkumar & Anr. Vs. Shriniwas & Ors.
B.V. Nagesh & Anr. Vs. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy
Bhoop Singh Vs. Ram Singh Major and others
Deoki Nandan Vs. Murlidhar and others
Gnambal Ammal V. T. Raju Ayyar
H.K.N. Swami Vs. Irshad Basith
Kuldeep Chand and another Vs. Advocate General to Government of H.P. and others
M. Appala Ramanujacharyula Vs. M. Venkatanarasimhacharyulu and others
Madan Lal Phulchand Jain Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Madhukar & Ors. Vs. Sangram & Ors.
Menakuru Dasaratharami Reddi Vs. Duddukuru Subba Rao
Mohd. Husain Khan and others Vs. Babu Kishva Nandan Sahai
Nagubai Ammul Vs. B. Shama Rao
Narendra Gopal Vidyarthi Vs. Rajat Vidyarthi
Raj Bajrang Bahadur Singh Vs. Thakurain Bakhtraj Kuer
Ramachandra Shenoy V. Mrs. Hilda Brite
Santosh Hazari Vs. Purushottam Tiwari Deceased by L.Rs.
Shailendra Narayan Bhanja Deo Vs. State of Orrisa
Shashidhar Vs. Ashwini Uma Mathod
Shyam Narain Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad
Shyamal Kanti Guha D Through LRs. & Ors. Vs. Meena Bose
Tilkayat Sri Govindlalji Maharaj Vs. State of Rajasthan and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.