PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Ipjacket Technology India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
M. D. Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd – Respondent
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Verma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mrs. Swati Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mrs. Akanksha Sharma, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and also respondent no.4.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
"(i) Pass a suitable order or direction to UPRNN to give the order of AMC in favour of petitioner and release the complete payment of 5 years at once i.e. Rs. 8,41,42,960.00 + 18% GST within a week so that the damages caused by the delays in payment of CCTV AMC may be covered.
(ii) Pass a suitable order or direction to accountant, Hon'ble High Court Lucknow to release the funds sanctioned by the government.
(iii) Pass a suitable order or direction to UPRNN to provide funds of the damaged CCTV and other equipment's due to fire that are not covered in AMC.
(iv) Pass a suitable order or direction to UPRNN to complete
the measurement of all the civil work etc. executed by the petitioner at gate no. 3A, 3B, 4 and 5 and
Bareilly Development Authority Vs. Ajay Pal Singh
Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Vishwanath Tea Company Ltd.
Joshi Technologies International Inc. vs. Union of India and others
Premji Bhai Parmar & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
Radhakrishna Agarwal & Ors. v. State of Bihar
Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.