SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 489

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD BENCH AT LUCKNOW
PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL, RAJNISH KUMAR, JJ.
State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy, Medical and Health and Others - Appellant
Versus
Kuljyoti Kumar Awasthi and Others (Inre 3924 S/S 2012) - Respondent
Special Appeal No. 106 of 2017
Decided On : 17-04-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Laltaprasad Misra, Adv., P.K. Khare, Adv., A.P. Singh, Adv.

The entitlement to benefits is based on the date of entry into the cadre and inclusion in the seniority list, and laches and delays can be valid grounds to dismiss a claim.

Headnote:

Malaria Inspectors - Pay Scale Discrepancy - 1952 - Summary: The court discussed the creation of posts of Malaria Inspectors and Surveillance Inspectors, the combined seniority list, pay scale revisions, and the legal implications of the orders and judgments related to the confirmation and pay scale of the petitioners. The court found that the respondents appointed in 1984-1985 were not entitled to the benefits granted to the Malaria Inspectors included in the seniority list dated 18.04.1978. The court set aside the judgment passed by the Single Judge.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a dispute over the pay scale and confirmation of Malaria Inspectors and Surveillance Inspectors. The respondents were appointed in 1984-1985 and challenged the order dated 14.10.1992 and 17.08.1999, seeking the pay scale of Rs.470-735 w.e.f. 01.07.1979.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondents appointed in 1984-1985 were not entitled to the benefits granted to the Malaria Inspectors included in the seniority list dated 18.04.1978. The judgment passed by the Single Judge was set aside.

Issues: The issues involved the entitlement of the respondents appointed in 1984-1985 to the pay scale and benefits granted to the Malaria Inspectors included in the seniority list dated 18.04.1978.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondents appointed in 1984-1985 were not entitled to the benefits granted to the Malaria Inspectors included in the seniority list dated 18.04.1978, as they were not in service on 01.07.1979 and part of the said seniority list.

Final Decision: The Special Appeal was allowed, and the judgment and order dated 30.10.2015 passed in Writ Petition Service Single No.3924 of 2012 was set aside.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard, Dr.L.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri A.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The preset intra court Special Appeal under Chapter-VIII, Rule-5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 has emanated from the judgment and order dated 30.10.2015, passed by the learned Writ Court in Writ Petition No.3924 (SS) of 2012 (Kuljyoti Kumar Awasthi & Others Versus State of U.P. and others). The learned Writ Court while allowing the writ petition has directed that the petitioners will also be entitled to the benefit of the pay scale of Rs.470-735 w.e.f. 01.07.1979 in the seniority list of 18.04.1978 as compared to other persons similarly situate.

3. The brief facts of the case for adjudication of the present controversy are that a Multi Purpose Worker Scheme was issued by the Government of India for eradication of Malaria, in which the posts of Malaria Inspectors and Surveillance Inspectors were created in one and the same pay scale of Rs.230-385. A combined inter-se seniority list dated 18.04.1978 was issued containing the names of Surveillance Inspectors and Malaria Inspectors. The pay revision took place in the year 1981 as per recommendation of Pay Commission, in which the Malaria Inspectors were given the pay scale of Rs.400-615, whereas the Surveillance Inspectors were given the pay scale of Rs.470-735 w.e.f. 01.07.1979. By means of the Notification dated 30.06.1981 the Central Government directed to keep the Malaria Inspectors out of the Scheme and they be posted at the Headquarters. The said directions were accepted by the State Government by means of the Government Order dated 31.01.1983. By that time the respondents/petitioners were not born in service. Since some of the senior persons in the combined seniority list were not confirmed and due to the discrepancies of pay scale created w.e.f. 01.07.1979 on the post of Malaria Inspectors and the Surveillance Inspectors, two writ petitions bearing No.213 of 1984 and writ petition no.2132 of 1984 were filed by the U.P. Malaria Nirikshak Sangh and others Versus State of U.P. and others. Both the writ petitions were clubbed together and decided by a common judgment and order dated 25.04.1989 with a direction to consider the matter pertaining to the confirmation of the petitioners in accordance with the seniority list circulated by the order dated 18th April, 1978, contained in Annexure no.4 to the writ petition and afford the petitioners the benefit of confirmation in accordance with the said seniority list. The operative portion of the order is extracted hereunder:-

"In view of what has been said hereinabove, a writ of mandamus is issued directing the respondents to reconsider the matter pertaining to the confirmation of the petitioners in accordance with the seniority list circulated by order dated 18th April, 1978, contained in Annexure-IV to the writ petition and afford the petitioners the benefit of confirmation in accordance with the said seniority list. No order as to costs."

4. Thereafter an application for clarification of the judgment and order dated 25.04.1989 was moved, which was disposed of by means of order dated 15.11.1989/13.12.1989, clarifying that in case the State Government decides the matter in favour of the petitioners certainly the benefit of re-fixation of pay scale vis-a-vis to that of Surveillance Inspector will be given to them. The operative part of the order is extracted below:-

"We had allowed the writ petitions by issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to re-consider the matter pertaining to the confirmation of the petitioners in accordance with the seniority list dated 10.04.78 contained in Annexure-4 to the writ petition and to afford the benefit of confirmation to the petitioners in accordance with the said seniority. Now in case the State Government decides the matter in favour of the petitioners, certainly the benefit of re-fixation of pay scale vis-a-vis to that of Surveillance Inspector wil



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top