SUDHIR AGARWAL, OM PRAKASH
Jeetu Nat – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
OM PRAKASH, J.
1. Aforesaid criminal (capital) appeal has been filed by accused appellants Jeetu Nat and Satish Nat against judgment and order dated 22.08.2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Kannauj in Special Sessions Trial No.34 of 2014 (State Vs. Jeetu Nat and another) arising out of case crime no. 574 of 2014 under Sections 376, 377, 325, 307, 302, 201 IPC and Section 5/6 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as "POCSO Act"), Police Station Chhibramau, District Kannauj whereby accused appellants have been convicted and sentenced to death punishment for offence under Section 302 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- each; for offence under section 376 IPC to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.25,000/- each; for offence under section 377 IPC to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, two years further imprisonment; for offence under section 325 IPC to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5000/- each and in default of payment of fine, one year further imprisonment; for offence under section 307 IPC to undergo imprisonmen
Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra (2012) 2 SCC 648
Avtar Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab
Bhoor Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab
Basava R. Patil & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Kuldip Singh & Ors. v. State of Delhi (2003) 12 SCC 528
Nar Singh Versus State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh alias Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
Santosh Kumar Singh v. State through CBI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.