SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 2511

R.K.AGRAWAL
U. P. State Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ranjit Saxena
For the Respondent: K.P. Agrawal and Satish Chaturvedi, S.C.

JUDGMENT :

R.K. Agrawal, J.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 181 of 1995 has been filed by U. P. State Electricity Board through Kanpur Electricity Supply Administration, Kanpur seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 12th September, 1994/19th September 1994 passed by the Labour Court I, U. P., Kanpur in Misc. Case No. 28 of 1994, filed as Annexure 9 to the writ petition and other consequential relief's. Vide order dated 12th September, 1994/19th September, 1994, the labour court has allowed the application for review filed by Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Respondent No. 2 and after setting aside the order dated 1st September, 1994, has directed the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,56,498.50 paise being the amount of back wages for the period 6th March, 1982 to 31st July, 1993, pursuant to the order of reinstatement.

2. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 10591 of 2004 has been filed by Kanpur Electricity Supply Company Limited, through its Managing Director, KESCO, Kanpur seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the award dated 21st May, 2003 passed by the Labour Court, I, U. P., Kanpur, Respondent No. 1, which has been pub
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top