SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 3175

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW BENCH
DEVI PRASAD SINGH, J.
Manjul Kumar and Another - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 9988 (S/S) of 2006
Decided On : 02-07-2007

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sampurnanand Shukla

Fraud vitiates every solemn act. The truth and untruth have been so intermixed that there is no option except to set aside the entire selection and its outcome keeping in view the law laid down by Apex Court in the case of Rajesh P.U. (supra).

Headnote:

SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT - CLASS IV EMPLOYEES - GROUP 'D' EMPLOYEES' SERVICE RULES, 1985 - ARTH & SANKHYA VIBHAG NIMN VARGIYA SEWA NIYAMAWALI, 1957 - SELECTION HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1985 RULES - OVERRIDING EFFECT - APPLICABILITY OF RULES - INTERVIEW - SHORT-LISTING OF CANDIDATES - TIME SPENT FOR EACH CANDIDATE - FRAUD - MANIPULATION OF MARKS - SELECTION QUASHED - FRESH ADVERTISEMENT DIRECTED.

Fact of the Case:

Petition challenging the select list of class IV employees appointed in pursuance to General Rules, namely; "Group 'D' Employees' Service Rules, 1985" (1985 Rules), on the ground that service conditions of the employees of the Arth and Sankhya Vibhag (department) are governed by Rules, namely; Arth & Sankhya Vibhag Nimn Vargiya Sewa Niyamawali, 1957 (Service Rules, as amended in 1997). Petitioners also alleged that the selection and appointment was sham and farce and things were manipulated for extraneous reasons and considerations.

Finding of the Court:

1. The selection was held in accordance with 1985 Rules, which have overriding effect over the Service Rules. 2. The interview was held for 26 days and 8,023 candidates appeared, rendering the entire interview sham and farce. 3. Marks of the selected candidates are not based on true and actual appreciation of their merit. 4. There was commission of fraud by the authorities with intention to extend undue advantage to certain candidates.

Issues: 1. Applicability of Rules 2. Interview 3. Select List

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The 1985 Rules have been framed in pursuance to power conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Since Legislature by virtue of Rule 3 has given overriding effect hence to the extent of inconsistency 1985 Rules shall be applicable. 2. The interview was held for about 8 hours a day then for 500 candidates during 8 hours of interview only one minute was given to each candidate. If the period of interview is enhanced to 10 hours then time spent for each candidate comes to almost 1.5 minute, which reveals that either only a formality was done by the Selection Committee with pre-decided mind. 3. From the details given in the preceding paragraphs, at the face of record, it is clear that in substantial number of cases either marks were increased or decreased. With regard to some of the candidates though marks were granted by the Members of the Selection Committee but it was not entered in the compilation chart, in substantial number of cases while making entry in the combined merit list marks have been increased, interpolation to some extent has also been done. Thus, it is evident that either on account of interpolation, unfair practice or by other unforeseen reasons the result has been affected and marks of the selected candidates are not based on true and actual appreciation of their merit.

Final Decision: Writ petition allowed. Selection list quashed. Fresh advertisement directed.

JUDGMENT :

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, J.

1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred challenging the select list of class IV employees in pursuance to which the opposite party Nos. 5 to 87 have been appointed. The question involved in the present writ petition is that ; whether selection and appointment which has been done in pursuance to General Rules, namely; "Group 'D' Employees' Service Rules, 1985" (in short hereinafter referred as 1985 Rules), is illegal in view of the fact that service conditions of the employees of the Arth and Sankhya Vibhag (in short hereinafter referred as the department) are governed by Rules, namely; Arth & Sankhya Vibhag Nimn Vargiya Sewa Niyamawali, 1957 (in short hereinafter referred as Service Rules, as amended in the year 1997). The other grounds raised by the Petitioners are that the selection and appointment was sham and farce and things were manipulated for extraneous reasons and considerations.

2. The opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 by an advertisement dated 28.7.2006 had invited applications to fill up 86 vacancies of Peons. The educational qualification prescribed for the post was class five passed and having knowledge of cycling. The last date for submission of the application forms was 17.8.2006. Petitioners have also submitted application forms to the Respondents through registered post. For the purpose of selection in question Sri Vishwa Nath Lal, Deputy Director, Azamgarh Region, Azamgarh, was attached to directorate of Economics & Statistics and was made Chairman of the Selection Committee by an order dated 20.7.2006, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-CA-1 to the counter-affidavit. By an order dated 20.7.2006, Sri V. N. Lal was authorised to make appointment in pursuance to selection in question passed by Director, Economic & Statistics, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-CA-2 to the counter-affidavit. The names were also summoned from the Employment Exchange and knowledge of cycling was made compulsory. Apart from 86 vacancies of Peon, one post of Sweeper was also advertised, which was reserved for Scheduled Caste Category. Reservation was given to Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and O.B.C. categories in accordance to rules. Total 13,941 candidates had applied and after scrutiny 52 applications were rejected and 13,889 candidates were called for interview and 8023 candidates appeared in the interview. For the post of Sweeper 40 applications were received out of which 10 applications were rejected and 30 candidates were called for interview. The interview was held from 4.9.2006 to 10.10.2006 (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and other Government holidays).

3. Apart from Sri V. N. Lal, the Chairman of the Selection Committee, other members were Sri A. K. Pandey, Deputy Director Economics, Sri L. K. Singh, Economics and Statistics Officer for the office of Deputy Director, Economics & Statistics, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Sri Akhileshwar Mishra, District Khadi and Gramouodhog Officer, the nominee of the District Magistrate, Lucknow. Admittedly, the selection was held according to Group 'D' Employees Services Rules, 1985 as amended by 3rd amendment in the year 1999, hereinafter referred as 1985 Rules.

4. According to learned standing counsel, the selection was held from 10.00 A.M. in the morning and almost 250-300 candidates were called on for interview everyday. Compilation/ evaluation of marks was completed by 7.00 p.m., as stated in paragraphs 16 to 18 of the counter-affidavit dated 18.12.2006 and paragraph 14 of the written argument submitted on behalf of the State. According to learned standing counsel it was decided that 5 marks shall be granted to the candidates who know cycling test and support their version through a certificate.

5. Though the int














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top